Histological effect of infectious bursal disease virus on bursa of fabricia, Thymus gland and bone marrow tissues with monitoring of virus antibodies level during experimental infection on broiler chicken.
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Infectious bursal disease virus infect wide range of poultry flocks across the word causing variable ranges of economic loses come from direct or indirect mortality through immune suppression by invading of B cell tissues, this study designed to show the effect of oral and ocular inoculated virus collected and processed from infected farms on bursa of fabricia, Thymus gland, bone marrow tissues with monitoring of virus antibody titer before and after age of inoculation (21 day old), the study showed different degrees of damage varies between tissues including degeneration, necrosis, congestion and edema, the study also showed that the maternal antibodies was high at the first day of hatching and the decrement of antibody titer happen directly after virus inoculation then increase in antibodies titer started gradually after two weeks of inoculation.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Tikrit Journal of Pure Science is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows users to copy, create extracts, abstracts, and new works from the article, alter and revise the article, and make commercial use of the article (including reuse and/or resale of the article by commercial entities), provided the user gives appropriate credit (with a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI), provides a link to the license, indicates if changes were made, and the licensor is not represented as endorsing the use made of the work. The authors hold the copyright for their published work on the Tikrit J. Pure Sci. website, while Tikrit J. Pure Sci. is responsible for appreciate citation of their work, which is released under CC-BY-4.0, enabling the unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction of an article in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
References
(1) Lukert P. D. and Saif Y. M.: Infectious Bursal Disease. In: Diseases of Poultry, 10th ed. B. W. Calnek, H. J. Barnes, C. W. Beard, L. R. McDougald, Y. M. Saif, eds. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA. 19997; 721-738.
(2) Saif Y.M.: Immunosuppression induced by infectious bursal disease virus. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1991; 30(1): 45-50.
(3) Lukert P.D.: Infectious bursal disease. In: Veterinary Diagnostic Virology, edited by A.E. Caster and W. P. Heuschere. Mosby year book.1992; 35-37.
(4) Mackenzie M. and Spradbrow, P.B.: Persistence of infectious bursal disease virus in experimentally infected chickens. Aust Vet J. 1981; 57(11): 534-5.
(5) ) Ignjatovic J., Sapats S., Reece R., Gould G., Selleck P., Lowther S., Boyle D. and Westbury H.: Virus strains from a flock exhibiting unusually high mortality due to infectious bursal disease. Australian Veterinary Journal. 2004; 82(12):763–768.
(6) Drury R. A. B., Wailgton, E. A. and Cameron S. R.: Carleton`s histological techniques 4th ed. Oxford university press. New York. 1985; (114): 327 – 363.
(7) Humason G.L.: Animal Tissue Techniques. W.H. Freeman Co., San Francisco, USA.: 1979; pp. 661.
(8) Inoue M., Fujita A. and Maeda K.: Lysis of Myelocytes in Chickens Infected with Infectious Bursal Disease Virus. Vet Pathol. 1999; 36:146–151.
(9) Paula M. B. C., Yokosawa J., Coutnho M. D. B., Slva P. L., Ferraz R. A., Olvera T. F. M., Queroz D. A. O.: Identification and molecular characterization of the infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) from an outbreak in a broiler flock in midwestern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2004; (35): 352-358.
(10) Sharma, J.M., Dohms, J., Walser, M., Snyder, D.B.: Presence of lesions without virus replication in the thymus of chickens exposed to infectious bursal disease virus. Avian Dis. 1993; 37:741–748.
(11) Tanimura N. & Sharma J. M.: In-situ apoptosis in chicken infected with infectious bursal disease virus. Journal of Comparative Pathology. 1998; 118: 15-27.
(12) Vasconcelos A. C. & Lam K. M.: Apoptosis in chicken embryos induced by the infectious bursal disease virus. Journal of Comparative Pathology. 1995; 112: 327-338.
(13) Ahmed Z. and Akhter S.: Role of Maternal Antibodies in Protection Against Infectious Bursal Disease in Commercial Broilers. International Journal of Poultry Science. 2003; 4: 251-255.
(14) Simon V.A., Ishizuka M.M.: Doença Infecciosa da bolsa de Fabricius º DIB. In: ; Berchieri AJ, Macari M, editors. Doenças das AvesFACTA. Campinas. 2000.p 351.
(15) Inoue M., Fukuda M., Miyano K.: Thymic lesions in chicken infected with infectious bursal disease virus. Avian Dis. 1994; 38:839–846.
(16) Tanimura N., Tsukamoto K., Nakamura K., Narita M. and Maeda M.: Association between pathogenicity of infectious bursal disease virus and viral antigen distribution detected by immunohistochemistry. Avian Dis. 1995; 39:9–20.
(17) Nunoya T., Otaki Y., Tajima M., Hiraga M. and Saito T.: Occurence of acute infectious bursal disease with high mortality in Japan and pathogenicity of field isolates in SPF chickens. Avian Dis. 1992; 36:596-609.
(18) Wyllie A.H., Kerr J.F. and Currie A.R.: Cell death: the significance of apoptosis. Int Rev Cytol. 1980; 68:251–306.
(19) Duvall E. and Wyllie A.H.: Death and the cell. Immunol Today. 1987; Pp.115–119.
(20) Fawthrop D.J., Boobis A.R. and Davies D.S.: Mechanisms of cell death. Arch Toxicol. 1991; 65:437–444.
(21) Michell B.C., Gomes, A. D., Baio, N. C., Resende, M., Lara, L. J. C. and Martins, N. R. S.: Effect of Maternally-Derived Antibodies on The Performance and Immunity of Broilers Induced by in
48
Ovo or Post-Hatching Immunizations with a Live Vaccine Against Infectious Bursal Disease.Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science. 2009; 11: 57 – 63.
(22) Van Der Berg T.P., Meulemans G.: Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry: protection afforded by maternally deviated antibodies and interference with live vaccination. Avian Pathology. 1991; 20:409- 421.
(23) Knoblich H. V., Sommer S. E. and Jackwood D. J.: Antibody titers to IBDV in broiler chicks after vaccination at one day of age with IBDV and Marek,s Disease virus. Avian Diseases. 2000; 44:874-884.
(24) Hassan M. K., Afify M. A. and Aly M. M.: Genetic Resistance of Egyptian Chickens to Infectious Bursal Disease and Newcastle Disease. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 2004; 36: 1-9.
(25) Azzam A. H. and Gabal, M. A.: Aflatoxin in layers hens. Avian Pathology. 1998; 27(6):570-577.
(26) Mohiudin S. M.: Effects of aflatoxin on immune response in viral diseases. Poult Adv. 1993; 26: 63-66.
(27) Lin T. W., Lo C. W., Lai S. Y., Fan R. J., Lo C. J., Chou Y. M., Thiruvengadam R., Wang A. H. and Wang M.Y.: Chicken heat shock protein 90 is a component of the putative cellular receptor complex of infectious bursal disease virus. J Virol. 2007; 81(16):8730-8741.
(28) Hatori Y., Sharma R. P. and Warren R. P.: Resistance of C57B1/6 mice to immunosuppressive effects of aflatoxin B sub(1) and relationship with
neuroendocrine mechanisms. Immunopharmacology. 1991; 22:127- 137.
(29) Ceica C. and Vasiu C.: The assessment of the antibody titer after IBDV vaccination using a life, liophilised vaccine in broilers depending on routes and doses of administration. Buletin USAMV Veterinary Medicine. 2008; 2:316-321.
(30) Muller H., Islam, M. R. and Raue, R.: Research on infectious bursal disease: the past, the present and the future. Vet Microbiol., 2003; 97: 153-165.