Interface defects within the junction region and its effect on the electrical and optical properties of a heterojunction solar cell

Main Article Content

Mussab J. Ahmed
Ayed N. Saleh

Abstract

The simulation model used in this study is the heterojunction solar cell with SnS absorption layer using the AFORS-HET simulation program. Where the effect of interface defect density (Nit) and the location of these levels within the interface on the electrical and optical properties was studied. Through the study, we learned the effect of the locations of the energy levels for defects within the junction, and it was found that the largest effect of the defects is within the locations of the deep energy levels, D.deep traps and A.deep traps within the junction. After that, the effect of interface defect density and its relationship to thickness and impurities concentration of both the buffer and absorption layer were studied, as the increase in the thickness of the absorption layer indicated a clear decrease in the effect of the density of the interface cases, otherwise the increase in the thickness of the buffer layer did not reduce the effect of these defects. The effect of the interface defect density increases with increasing the concentration of impurities in the SnS absorption layer, the effect of the density of the interlayer defects decreases with the increase in the concentration of impurities in the buffer layer.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mussab J. Ahmed, & Ayed N. Saleh. (2021). Interface defects within the junction region and its effect on the electrical and optical properties of a heterojunction solar cell. Tikrit Journal of Pure Science, 26(5), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.25130/tjps.v26i5.185
Section
Articles

References

[1] Yoshikawa, Y. et al. (2017). ‘Exceeding conversion efficiency of 26% by heterojunction interdigitated back contact solar cell with thin film Si technology’, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 173: 37–42,.

[2] Gopinath, G. R. et al.( 2014). Compositional investigation of potassium doped Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with efficiencies up to 20.8% Physica Status Solidi - Rapid Research Letters 8 : 219–22’, ISRN Condens. Matter Phys., 2013: 1–6 .

[3] Kanevce, A. et al. (2017). SnS thin film solar cells with Zn1− xMgxO buffer layers. J. Appl. Phys., 121(21): 214506.

[4] Kim, J. et al. (2014). ‘High efficiency Cu2ZnSn (S, Se) 4 solar cells by applying a double In2S3/CdS emitter’, Adv. Mater., vol. 26 (44): 7427–7431.

[5] Minemoto, T.; Harada, S. and Takakura, H.( 2012). ‘Cu (In, Ga) Se2 superstrate-type solar cells with Zn1− xMgxO buffer layers’, Curr. Appl. Phys. 12 (1):. 171–173.

[6] Kamazani, M.; Zarghami, Z. and Niasari, M. (2016). “Antireflection coatings on solar cells”, J. Phys. Chem. C, 120(4): 2096–2108.

[7] Baig, F. et al.(2018). ‘Numerical analysis a guide to improve the efficiency of experimentally designed solar cell’, Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process., 124(7):1–8.

[8] Gandham, B.; Hill, R., Macleod, H. A. and M. Bowden.(1979). ‘Antireflection coatings on solar cells’, Sol. Cells, 1 (1): 3–22.

[9] Bente, K.; Lazenka, V. V., Unuchak, D. M., Wagner, G. and Gremenok, V. F.(2010). ‘Epitaxial Sn1‐xPbxS nanorods on iso‐compositional thin films’, Cryst. Res. Technol. J. Exp. Ind. Crystallogr., vol. 45(6): 643–646.

[10] Gunasekaran, M. and Ichimura, M.(2007), ‘Photovoltaic cells based on pulsed electrochemically deposited SnS and photochemically deposited CdS and Cd1− xZnxS’, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 91(9): 774–778.

[11] Jayasree, Y.; Chalapathi, U. and Bhaskar, P. U.(2012) . ‘Effect of precursor concentration and bath temperature on the growth of chemical bath deposited tin sulphide thin films’, Appl. Surf. Sci., 258 (7): 2732–2740.

[12] Albers, W.; Haas, Vink, C., H. J., and Wasscher, J. D. (1961). ‘Investigations on SnS’, J. Appl. Phys., 32(10): 2220–2225.

[13] Kawano, Y.; Chantana, J. and Minemoto, T.(2015). ‘Impact of growth temperature on the properties of SnS film prepared by thermal evaporation and its photovoltaic performance’, Curr. Appl. Phys., 15(8): 897–901.

[14] Arvizu J. A.; Piedrahita, M. and Vigil,O. (2015). ‘SnS-based thin film solar cells: perspectives over the last 25 years’, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron., 26 (7): 4541–4556.

[15] Baig, F. et al. 2018. ‘Efficiency enhancement of SnS solar cell using back surface field’, Proc. - 2018, IEEE 1st Int. Conf. Power, Energy Smart Grid, ICPESG, p. 1–5.

[16] Ramya, K. and Ramakrishna, K. T.(2018). ‘Investigations on the parameters limiting the performance of CdS/SnS solar cell’, Int. J. Energy Res., 42 (5):1914–1920.

[17] Ahmmed, S.; Aktar, A., Hossain, J. and Ismail, A. B. M. (2020). ‘Reduced defect density at the CZTSSe/CdS interface by atomic layer deposition of Al2O3’, Sol. Energy, 207 (July): 693–702.

[18] Erkan, M. E.; Chawla, V., and Scarpulla, M. A.. 2016. ‘Reduced defect density at the CZTSSe/CdS interface by atomic layer deposition of Al2O3’, J. Appl. Phys., 119 (19).

[19] Kuddus, A.; Rahman, M. F., Ahmmed, S., Hossain, J. and Ismail, A. B. M.(2019). ‘Role of facile synthesized V2O5 as hole transport layer for CdS/CdTe heterojunction solar cell: Validation of simulation using experimental data’, Superlattices Microstruct.,132(June): 106168.

[20] Lin, P. et al.(2014). ‘Numerical simulation of Cu2ZnSnS4 based solar cells with In2S3 buffer layers by SCAPS-1D’, J. Appl. Sci. Eng., 17(4): 383–390.

[21] Chouhan, A. S.; Jasti, N. P. and Avasthi, S.(2018). ‘Effect of interface defect density on performance of perovskite solar cell: Correlation of simulation and experiment’, Mater. Lett., 221: 150–153.

[22] Srivastava, S.; Singh, S. and Singh, V. K. (2021). ‘Bulk and interface defects analysis of n-CdS/p-Si heterojunction solar cell’, Opt. Mater. (Amst)., 111: 110687.

[23] Ahmmed, S.; Aktar, A., Hossain, J. and Ismail, A. B. M(2020). ‘Enhancing the open circuit voltage of the SnS based heterojunction solar cell using NiO HTL’, Sol. Energy, 207: 693–702.