A comparison between Bayes estimation and the estimation of the minimal unbiased quadratic Standard of the bi-division variance analysis model in the presence of interaction
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this study, the variance compounds parameters of the mixed bi-division variance analysis sample are estimated. This estimation is obtained, by Bayes quadratic unbiased estimator. The second way to estimate variance compounds parameters of a suggested tow-way analysis of variance mixed model with interaction. estimation is done out by the approach called (MINQUÉ). The estimation approach is conducted on true obtained from departments at the college of agriculture/university of Mosul. These data represent the development of growing various kinds of tomato so that the development represents three factors: the first is tomato kind, this is the first factor (H) and the factor of natural fertilizer rate, and this is the second factor (M), and the interaction between the two factors (HM). A random sample is taken from these data in order to get the random linear sample. The elementary values estimated by Bayes unbiased estimator are very much close to those estimated by variance analysis style when compared with the estimated values of the variance estimation parameters done by minimum standard quadratic unbiased estimation. The elementary values represent random linear sample parameters used to estimate minimum quadratic unbiased standard. The elementary values of the estimations are also obtained via analyzing bi-division variance, then these estimations are employed in estimating minimum
quadratic unbiased standard. the estimation results by Bayes approach are very similar to those done by variance analysis.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Tikrit Journal of Pure Science is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows users to copy, create extracts, abstracts, and new works from the article, alter and revise the article, and make commercial use of the article (including reuse and/or resale of the article by commercial entities), provided the user gives appropriate credit (with a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI), provides a link to the license, indicates if changes were made, and the licensor is not represented as endorsing the use made of the work. The authors hold the copyright for their published work on the Tikrit J. Pure Sci. website, while Tikrit J. Pure Sci. is responsible for appreciate citation of their work, which is released under CC-BY-4.0, enabling the unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction of an article in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
References
[1] chauvent, w. (1963) "A manual of spherical and practical astonomy",Vol.11:teory and use of astronomical in instrument. JB. Iippincontt and CO. Pillad
[2] Airy, G.B (1861):"On the algebraically and numerical theory of errors of observation and the combination of observation".Mac Milan and Co. Cambridge. London.
[3] Ismael, Yun's Hazim( 2005); Detecting the outliers values using the mixed distribution depending on Gibbs preview and Bays Method (unpublished Master Thesis), College of Education, University of Mosul.
[4] Fathi, Iman Tariq, (2006);Bayes estimation in the mixed linear models using Gibs preview (unpublished Master Thesis), College of Education, University of Mosul.
[5] Qasim Mohammed Natheer, Ibrahim, Qasim, Aghsan Mahmoud, (2006), Estimation of Variance compounds by the non - linear maximization, "Iraqi Journal of Statistical Sciences (10), (2006) page (48-60), University of Mosul, College of Computer Sciences and Mathematics.
[6] Mansouri, K., Abdelaziz, A., Rybacka, A. et al. (2016). CERAPP: Collaborative estrogen receptor activity prediction project. Environ Health Perspect 124, 1023-1033. doi:10.1289/ ehp.1510267
[7] Rao, C.R. (1972): "Estimation of variance and covariance component in linear models". J. Am. Static. Assoc., Vol. 67,p.112 - 115.
[8] Kleffe,J.and Pincus,R.(1974): "Bayes and best quadratic unbiased estimator parameters of the covariance matrix in linear model. Math, operation statist,PP.43 – 67.
(BAQUE), which has already been illustrated in the theoretical part; has been applied and the estimation results are illustrated via Bayes style compared with variance analysis as in table (5) which almost compatible. Then, the parameters have been estimated by minimal unbiased quadratic standard together with standard error of parameters (????1 ,????2 , ????3, ????4) as is shown in table
(6) where there is a difference between (MANQUÉ) and (BAQUE) estimation. Out of these results, have come up with the fact that the estimations conducted by the unbiased Bayes estimator style are much better than finding these estimations via minimal unbiased quadratic standard.
[9] Slob, W. (2014b). Benchmark dose and the three Rs. Part II. Consequences for study design and animal use. Crit Rev Toxicol 44, 568-580. doi:10.3109/10408444. 2014. 925424.
[10] Slob, W. (2014a). Benchmark dose and the three Rs. Part I. Getting more information from the same number of animals. Crit Rev Toxicol 44, 557-567. doi:10.3109/10408444.2014.9 25423 .
[11] Jeffreys, H.(1961):Theory of probability. Clarenden press, Oxford, London.
[12] WHO/IPCS (2014). Guidance Document on Evaluating and Expressing Uncertainty in Hazard Characterization. http://www.
[13] Mistal,I,(1997):estimation of variance components with large-scale Dominance models.
[14] Rao,C.R.and Kleffe,J.(1988): "Estimation of variance andcovariance component and application north Holland,Amsterdam.
[15] Searl, S . R .Casella ,G .and Mcculloch ,C. E. (1992): Variance component.Wiley,New York.
[16] Asparouhov & Muthén (2012). General random effect latent variable modeling: Random subjects, items, contexts, and parameters.
[17] Mondal, P.K. (2000): "on the principle of manqué for the estimation of variance and covariance component". Concordia university Montreal, Qduebec,CanDA, PP. 1-39.
[18] Fox & Verhagen (2011). Random item effects modeling for cross-national survey data. In
E. Davidov & P. Schmidt, and J. Billiet (Eds.), Cross - cultural Analysis: Methods and Applications.
[19] Tice, R. R., Austin, C. P., Kavlock, R. J. and Bucher, J. R. (2013). Improving the human hazard characterization of chemicals: A Tox21 update. Environ Health Perspect121, 756-765. doi:10.1289/ehp.1205784.