Studying of antagonistic activity of some probiotics against bacteria P.mirabilis isolated from kidney stones
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study Included (68)gritkidneys samples collected from patients undergoingsurgerylin hospitals in Tikrit city from periodbetween April 2012to May2013.
The results showed that (64.71%) of males and (35.29 %) of females were infected, the propotion of males to females (1.83: 1).
Results of biochemical tests and API-20system showed that E.coli and Ps.aeruginosa were the most frequent bacterial isolates among other isolated bacterial species with percentage (30.76%) and (21.22%), respectively, while P. mirabilis was (15.38%) followed by bacteria and Kl.pneumoniae Citrobacter. freundii with isolation percentage (9.6%) and (5.67%) respectively. other species such as (Staph. aureus,, Acinetobacter. freundii, E.faecalis Serratia. marscenes) accounted (1.92%).
Antigonstic activity of six types of probiotics against P. mirabilis were studied. Results showed that all probiotics types showed inhibition activity against P.mirabilis isolates and diameter of inhibition zone was highest (21.6 ml), when probiotic L. delbruckii used, while L. acidophilus showed less inhibitory activity against P. mirabilis isolate, the diameter of inhibition zone was 15.1.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Tikrit Journal of Pure Science is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows users to copy, create extracts, abstracts, and new works from the article, alter and revise the article, and make commercial use of the article (including reuse and/or resale of the article by commercial entities), provided the user gives appropriate credit (with a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI), provides a link to the license, indicates if changes were made, and the licensor is not represented as endorsing the use made of the work. The authors hold the copyright for their published work on the Tikrit J. Pure Sci. website, while Tikrit J. Pure Sci. is responsible for appreciate citation of their work, which is released under CC-BY-4.0, enabling the unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction of an article in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
References
1-Mittal, R.D and Kumar, R. (2004).Gut-inhabiting
bacterium Oxalobacter formignes: role in calcium
oxalate urolithiasis. J. Endourol. 18: 418-424.
2-Hoe, L.W . (2007). Identification of BioMarker
and Development of Screening Method for Kidney
stones Disease. Msc, thesis. Universiti Sains
Malaysia.
3-Moe, O.W.(2006). Kidney stones: pathophysiology
and medical management . Lancet , 367: 333-344.
4-Morgenstein, R. M., B. Szostek, and P. N.
Rather.(2010). Regulation of gene expression during
swarmer cell differentiation in Proteus mirabilis.
Microbiology reviews 34:753-763.
5-Aquilini, E.(2012). Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) core
biosynthesis in proteus mirabilis. Ph.D. University
Barcelona
6-Reid, G., Sanders, M.E., Gaskins, H.R., Gibson,
G.R., Mercenier, A., Rastall, R.A., Roberfroid, M.B.,
Rowland, I., Cherbut, C and Klaenhammer, T.R.
(2003). New scientific paradigms for Probiotics
and Prebiotics .J. Clin .Gastroenterol. 37:105-118.
7-Reid, G.( 1999).The Scientific Basis for Probiotic
Strains of Lactobacillus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65:3763-3766.
8-Cebeci, A and Gürakan, C.2003. Properties of
potential probiotic Lactobacillus plantarumstrains
Food Microbiol . 20:511-518.
9-Magwira, C.A.(2008). Molecular diversity of
faecal Lactobacillus species in stone-free black and
white South African population groups and their
possible role in kidney stone disease. Ph.D.
University of Cape Town
10-Kabanda, S.M .(2010). Evaluation Oxalate –
Degrading Lactobacillus Spp for their ability to be
used as Probiotics in the treatment of kidney stone
disease. Msc .Thesis. University of Cape Town.
11-Ruda JM, Hollenbeak CS, Stack BC Jr. (2005).
A systematic review of the diagnosis and treatment of
primary hyperparathyroidism from 1995 to 2003
12-Chattopadhyay N. (2006). Effects of calciumsensing
receptor on the secretion of parathyroid
hormone – related peptide and its impact on humoral
hypercalcemia of malignancy. Am. J.Physiol
Endocrinol Metab ; 290(5): E761-770.
13-Gault, M. H; Longerich L. L; Crane G; Cooper
R; Dow D; Best, L; Stockall, E; Brown, W. (1995).
Bacteriology of urinary tract stones. J. Urol.; 153:
1164-1170.
14- Dewan B., Sharma M., Nayak N., and Sharma S.
K. (1997). Upper urinary tract stones and ureaplasma
urealyticum. J. Med. Res. 107: 15-21.
15-Bratell S., Brorson J. E., Grenabo L., Hedelin H.,
and Petterson S: Thebacteriology of operated renal
stones. Eur. Urol., 1990; 17: 58-61.
16-Holt, J.G; Krieg, N .R, Sneath, P.H.A, Staley, J.T;
Williams, S.T. (1994). Bergeys manual of
determinable bacteriology 9th ed. William and
Wilkins, Baltimore.
17-Mahon, C; Manuselis, G. (2001). Text book of
Diagnostic microbiology 2nd edition. W. B. Saunders
Company.
18-Blomberg, L. A; Henriksson, M and Conway, P.
L .(1993). Ihibition of adhesion of E.coli K88 to
piglet ideal mucus by lactobacillus spp . App .
Environ . Microbiol . 59:34- 39
21-Janakiram,B; SuniTha, T; BaBu, M,R; Swapna,
G; Sekhar, B.C and Bondii. J.S. (2014). Etiology of
Urolithiasis from South Indian population: correlation
of Recurrence and antibiotic Resistance to Biofilm
production capabilities of uropathgenic Microbes.
22-Gurau ,G., Dobre, M., Paula, P., Matei, M,N.,
Lupoae, M., Voinescu, D.C. (2014) .Evalution of the
chemical composition of Renal Stones. Analele
Universitais ''Dunarea Dejos'' Galati Medicina .(1) :
111-118.
23- Bergsland, K.J; Kinder, J.M; Asplin, J.R; Coe,
B.J and Coe, F.L.(2002). Influence of gender and age
on calcium oxalate crystal growth inhibition by urine
from relatives of stone forming patients. J. Urol. 167:
2372-2376.
24-Parks, J.H; Coward, M and Coe, F.L.(1997).
Correspondence between stone composition andurine
supersaturation in Nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int.
51:894-900.
25-Ryall, R.L; Harnett, R.M; Hibberd, C. M;
Mazzachliu , R.D .and Marshal,V. R .(1987).Urinary
Risk Factors in Caox stone disease , Comparison of
men and women .Br . J .Urol ., 55:480-488
26-Alexander, S.K and Srete, D. (2001).
Microbiology "Aphotographic atlas for the
laboratory" Benjamin Cummins, an imprint of
Addison Welsey Longman , Inc.pp
27- Collee, J. G; Fraser AG, Marmion, B.P;
Simmons, A. (1996). "Mackie and McCartney
Practical Medical Microbiology". 14th ed., Churchill
Livingstone, New York. p. 413-423.
28-Koneman, E; Allen, S; Tanda, W; Procop, G;
Schreckenberger, P; Woods, G . (2006). Koneman,s
color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic
Microbiology, 6ed. Washington winn, Jr. United states
of America.
29-Alkadasi, M,N., A- Ameri., G.A., Hansh, S., Ali,
W.A.M., Naji, A.S. ,Saif, N.A., Alsami, A and Zaid,
A.A. (2014). Incidence of rend stone disease among
Urinary Tract infection Patients and antimicrobials
Susceptibilty Pelagia Research Library .Adv. Appl.
Sci Res., 5(3): 309-314 .
30- Kore, A.T., Singh, G and pawar, S.G. (2013).
Bacteriological Profile of urine in Patients with
Urinary Calcoli.3(8) : 600- 601.
31--Amdekar, S; Dwivedi, D; Roy, P; Kushwah, S
and Singh, V. (2010). Probiotics: multifarious oral
vaccine against infections traumas. Immunology and
medical microbiology (59): 299-307.
32-Seenivasan, P; Manickkam, J and Savarimuthu, I.
(2006). In vitro antibacterial activity of some plant
essential oils . BMC Complementary and Alternative
Medicine. 6,39.
33-Aziz, Z. Z. (2004). Using Lactic acid bacteria to
encounter the pathological effect of Proteus
mirabilis on the gastrointestinal tissue of mice. thesis,
college of science, University of Al- Nahrain , Iraq .
34-Gilliland S, E and Speck, M. L.(1972).
Interaction of food starter cultures and food born
pathogens: Lactic Streptococci versus , Staphylococci
sp and Salmonella spp. Miller food technol . 35 (5):
307-310
35-Al- Jeboury , G.H.A. (2010). In vitro and in vivo
study of Probiotics Effect of Lactobacillus
acidophilus on pathogenecity of Proteus mirabilis
Isolated from urinary tract infection (uti). J.
Bacteriology. Vol 4, 2: 53-63.
36-Al- Shebani, A.W.B. and Al-Jebouri, G.
H.(2008). Using Lactobacillus as Probiotic to inhibit
growth and adhesion of Proteus mirabilis causing
urinary tract infection. Biotechnology Research
center / Al –Nahrain University. 2: 19-31
37-Ahmed, A. A. (2013). In vitro screening of
Lactobacillus species from Homemade Yoghurt for
Antagonistic Effects against common bacterial
pathogens . Jourdan Journal of Biological Sciences , 6
: 211-216.
38- Mobolaji, O. A and Wuraola, F. O. (2011).
Assessment of the antimicrobial activity of Lactic
acid bacteria Isolated from two fermented Maize
products – ogi and Kunnu – Zaki . Malaysian Journal
of Microbiology. 7(3): 124-128.
39-Falahee, M.B; Adams, M.R; Dale, J.W and
Morris, B.A. (1990). An enzyme immune assay for
nisin. Inter. J. food . Tech ; 25: 590-595.
40-Cadirci,. H. and Citak, S. (2005). Acomparison
of two BMethods used for Measuring Antagonistic
Activity of lactic acid bacteria. Pakistan. J. Nut. 4(4):
237-241
41-Salman, J.A.S. (2008). Synbiotics Effect of
Probiotic (Bifidobacterium ) and Prebiotics (Chicory
and Inulin) against some pathogenic bacteria . Um –
Salama Science Journal . 6(2): 354-360.
42- Collado , M. C; Hernandez, M and Sanz, Y.
(2005). Production of bacteriocin like inhibitory
compounds by Human fecal Bifidobacterium strains .
J. Food . prot . 68: 1034-1040.
43-Meera, N. S and Devi, M. C. (2012). Partial
characterization and optimization of parameters for
Bacteriocin production by probiotic Lactic acid
bacteria. J. Microbiol. Biotech . Res . 2(2): 357-365.
44-Umasankari, I and Sekar, C.(2015). Antagonistic
Activity of Lactobacillus Against UTI pathogens.
American Journal of Pharmacy and Health Research .
3(1): 284-291.
45-Dini, P; Amarloie, O. A; M oghadam, M.F and
Moosakhani, F. (2012). The comparison of
Antagonistic Effect of normal vaginal Lactobacilli
and some commonly used Antibiotics on Isolated
bacteria of uterine infections in Dairy cows.
International Journal of Animal and veterinary
Advances. 4(6): 358-362.
46-Garuer, K. I and Muriana, P.M. (1994).
Purification and amino acid sequence curvaticin. Fs
47, aheat–stable Bacteriocin produced by
Lactobacillus Fs 47 . Appl –environ . Microbiol . 60:
2191-2195.
47-Hua, W; Yang, X; Yonghua, X; Feng, X and
Gengpin, L. (2007). Synergistic anti digestion effect
of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and bovine colostrums in
simulated gastrointestinal tract, (in vitro). Applied
Microbiology and Biotechnology . 75, 619 -626.
48-Marianelli, C; Cifani, N; Pasquali. p .(2010).
Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of Probiotic
bacteria against Salmonrlla enterica subsp .enterica
serovar typhimurium 1344 in acommon medium
under different environmental codition, Res
Microbiol; 161(8): 673-680.
49-Rodríguez, E., J.L. Arqués, R. Rodríguez, M.
Nuñez, M. Medina. 2003. Reuterin production by
lactobacilli isolated from pig faeces and evaluation of
probiotic traits. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 37: 259-263
50-De Vuyst, L., B. Degeest. 1999.
Heteropolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria.
FEMSMicrobiol. Rev. 23, 153-177.
51-Caplice, E and Fitzgerald, G.F. (1999). Int. J.
Food Microbiol., , 50, 131-149.
52-Millete, M; Luquet, F. M. and L acroix, M .
(2006). In vitro growth control of selected pathogens
by Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus Casei
– fermented milk . Letters in Applied Microbiology,
44, 314-319.
53-Turpin, W; Humblot, C; Thomas, M; Guyot , J.
(2010). Lactobacilli as multifaceted Probiotics with
poorly disclosed molecular mechanism. Int . J. Food.
Microbiol , 143, 87-102
54--Ross , R.P ; Morgan, S; Hill, C. (2002). Int . J.
Food microbial, 79: 3-16.
.Otolaryngol . Head Neck Surg ; 132(3): 359-72.
55-Eklund . T . (1984). The effect of carbon dioxide
on bacterial groth and on uptake processes in the
bacterial membrane vesicles . Int . J. Food Microbiol .
1:179-185.
56-Servin, A. L. (2006). Antagonistic activities of
Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria against microbial
pathogen. FEMS. Microbiol , REV . 28: 405-440
57-Faylo– Messaoud, D; Berger, C.N; Co Connier –
polter, M; Lievin-Le moal, V; Servin, A.L .(2005).
PH-.Lactic acid, and non lactic acid – dependent
activities of Probiotic Lactobacilli against Salmonella
enterica serovar typhimurium. Appl, Environ,
Microbiol; 7(10); 6008-6013