Theoretical Study of Carrier Concentration Impact on the Photocurrent and Efficiency of RuTH–TiO2 DSSCs

Main Article Content

Hadi J. M. Al-Agealy
Raghad Lafta Mohammed
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5193-8054

Abstract

In this work, we study and calculate the efficiency of RuTH dye-contact TiO₂ semiconductor-based dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) using quantum charge transport. We studied and evaluated the impact of flow current density, based on interface reorganization energy, force coupling, atomic density, effective path length and the concentration and polarity of both RuTH and TiO2 dyes, on the charge-transport process. We discussed and analyzed the influence of strong coupling and concentration on flow current density in RuTH-TiO2 devices, as reflected in the electronic transfer results. The results show that flow current density is strongly affected by concentration and strength coupling, which determine the efficiency of RuTH-TiO2 devices. The efficiency, influenced by the increased carrier concentration of TiO2, plays a significant role in the increased flow of current in the charge transport reaction and limits the electrical properties of RuTH-TiO₂ devices. Specifically, the strength of the coupling between the RuTH dye and TiO₂ affects electron transport. It plays a key role in modulating current density and efficiency; stronger coupling increases electron transport, and vice versa. Additionally, increasing the concentration from (2×10¹⁸ cm⁻³) to (4×10¹⁸ cm⁻³) is favorable and increases efficiency from (4.543 %) to (9.227 %); this suggests that RuTH dye is a suitable contact for TiO2-based DSSC devices. 

Article Details

How to Cite
J. M. Al-Agealy , H., & Lafta Mohammed, R. (2026). Theoretical Study of Carrier Concentration Impact on the Photocurrent and Efficiency of RuTH–TiO2 DSSCs. Tikrit Journal of Pure Science, 31(4), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.25130/tjps.v31i4.2030
Section
Articles

References

1. Singh M, Kanaparthi RK. Theoretical exploration of 1,3-Indanedione as electronacceptor-cum-anchoring group for designing sensitizers towardsDSSC applications. Solar Energy. 2022;237:456-69.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.01.018

2. Kumar R, Chaudhary MP, Al-Ahmed A, Bhattacharyya S, von Gratowski S, Iqbal J, et al. Photo-to-chemical energy transformation: Pioneering photocatalysts, surface and interface engineering. Mater Res Bull. 2024;180:113046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2024.113046

3. Orellana W. D-pi-A dye attached on TiO2(101) and TiO2(001) surfaces: Electron transfer properties from ab initio calculations. Solar Energy. 2021;216:266-73.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.12.061

4. Hossain N, Mobarak MH, Mimona MA, Islam MA, Hossain A, Zohura FT, et al. Advances and significances of nanoparticles in semiconductor applications – A review. Results Eng. 2023;19:101347.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101347

5. Saedi A, Moradi AM, Kimiagar S, Panahi HA. Efficiency Enhancement of Dye Sensitized Solar Cells Based on Gracilaria/Ulva Using Graphene Quantum Dot. Int J Environ Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-020-00265-2

6. Al-Agealy HJM, Salih WB, Murdhi TS. Theoretical Study of the Transfer Rate Constant for Electron at Metal /Liquid Interface. J Thi-Qar Sci. 2014;4(4). https://doi.org/10.32792/utq/utjsci/v4i4.678

7. Abdulla HA, Ali AM, Hassoon KI. Structural and Optical Properties for TiO2 thin films Prepared by Screen Printing method. Tikrit J Pure Sci. 2019;24(5). https://doi.org/10.25130/tjps.v24i5.420

8. Otero R, Vázquez de Parga AL, Gallego JM. Electronic, structural and chemical effects of charge-transfer at organic/inorganic interfaces. Surf Sci Rep. 2017;72(3):105-45.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfrep.2017.03.001

9. Aguirre-Araque JS, Guimaraes RR, Toma HE. Chemistry of ternary monocarboxyterpyridine-bipyridine-trimercaptotriazine ruthenium complexes and application in dye sensitized solar cells. Polyhedron. 2020;182:114513.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2020.114513

10. Farzadi R, Moghaddam HM, Farmanzadeh D. Tuning the spin transport properties of ferrocene-based single molecule junctions by different linkers. Chem Phys Lett. 2018;704:37-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2018.05.037

11. Al Maadhde TS, Jumali MH, Al-Agealy HJM, Razak FBA, Yap CC. An Investigation of the Fill Factor and Efficiency of Molecular Semiconductor Solar Cells. Mater Sci Forum. 2021;1039:373-81. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.1039.373

12. Al-Obaidi SS, Al-Agealy HJM, Abbas SR. Theoretical Evaluation of Flow Electronic Rate at Au /TFB Interface. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021;1879(3):032096. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1879/3/032096

13. Abd ALI NN, Al-Agealy HJM, Moghaddam HM. Determining of Efficiency for the N749 Dye Contact with TiO2 in Dye Sensitized Solar Cell. Ibn Al-Haitham J Pure Appl Sci. 2024;37(1). https://doi.org/10.30526/37.1.3235

14. Al-Agealy HJ, Hassoni MA. A theoretical study of the effect of the solvent type on the reorganization energies of dye /semiconductor system interface. Ibn-ALHaithem J Pure Appl Sci. 2010;23(3):51-7. https://doi.org/10.32792/utq/utjsci/v4i4.678

15. Al-Agealy HJ, Moghaddam HM, Ali MJ. Theoretical Study of the Electronic Characteristic of a TiO2 -N719 Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell. Ibn Al-Haitham J Pure Appl Sci. 2024;37(2). https://doi.org/10.30526/37.2.3381

16. Royea WJ, Fajardo AM, Lewis NS. Fermi Golden Rule Approach to Evaluating Outer-Sphere Electron-Transfer Rate Constants at Semiconductor/ Liquid Interfaces. J Phys Chem B. 1997;101(50):11152-9. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp972222y

17. kamil MA, Mohammed SJ. Simulation study of back surface and electron transport layers on Sb2Se3 solar Cell. Tikrit J Pure Sci. 2020;25(6). https://doi.org/10.25130/tjps.v25i6.319

18. Salim KD. Studying the effect of light intensity and dust on efficiency of Silicon Solar cell. Tikrit J Pure Sci. 2021;26(4):68-70. https://doi.org/10.25130/tjps.v26i4.164

19. Al-Agealy HJ, AlMaadhede TS, Hassooni MA, Sadoon AK, Ashweik AM, Mahdi HA, et al. Theoretical study of electronic transfer current rate at dye-sensitized solar cells. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing LLC; 2018. p. 030055. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5039242

20. Mohsin MAR, Al-Agealy HJM. Theoretical calculation of the electronic current at N3 contact with TiO2 solar cell devices. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing LLC; 2022. p. 020060. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0092690

21. Haynes WM. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 95th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17118

22. Al-Agealy HJ, Sabri NA. Theoretical studies of electronic transition characteristics of sensitizer molecule dye N3-SnO2 semiconductor interface. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing LLC; 2022. p. 020062.

https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0092345

23. Lin YJ, Yang SH. Carrier transport and photoresponse for heterojunction diodes based on the reduced graphene oxide-based TiO2 composite and p-type Si. Appl Phys A. 2014;116(1):91-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-013-8166-5

24. Gnida P, Jarka P, Chulkin P, Drygała A, Libera M, Tnski T, et al. Impact of TiO2 Nanostructures on Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Performance tert-Butyl alcohol (CH3)3COH. Materials. 2021;14(7):1633.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14071633